By Somi Seong
The mind Korea 21 application (BK21), which seeks to make Korean study universities globally aggressive and to provide extra fine quality researchers in Korea, presents investment to graduate scholars and professors who belong to analyze teams at most sensible universities. The authors increase quantitative and qualitative versions to judge how good BK21 is pleasing its pursuits and make feedback for extra stimulating Korean collage learn.
Read or Download Brain Korea 21 Phase II: A New Evaluation Mode PDF
Best nonfiction_2 books
- Hookworm Infection and Anaemia
- Ensign Flandry
- Myths and Legends Related to the Eclipse
- Serious Money: How To Make It And Enjoy It
Additional resources for Brain Korea 21 Phase II: A New Evaluation Mode
Phase I and Phase II Comparison The Phase I and Phase II programs are not much diﬀerent from each other in their goals and missions, funding rules, and selection criteria. The few diﬀerences between the two are subtle and nuanced 6 In BK21 Phase II, applied science is classiﬁed into seven areas: information technology, mechanical engineering, chemical engineering, material engineering, construction engineering, applied biological science, and interdisciplinary fusion science. Basic science includes ﬁve areas: physics, biological science, chemistry, mathematics, and earth science.
MoE (2006c) notes that the ultimate goals of the program are (1) nurturing creative research manpower for the future and (2) fostering research universities specialized in speciﬁc academic disciplines. 3 Many respondents identiﬁed two similar, related goals for BK21: providing graduate education to the next generation of workers and increasing the quality and quantity of Korean university research. A number of respondents said that the two goals—the education goal and the research goal—sometimes conﬂicted.
Training indicators in the survey included length 7 B. K. Kim et al (2005) also sought to identify linkages between employment and human resources goals of the BK21 program, reviewing literature on the future demand for and supply of highly educated manpower. Implications of Phase I Program Evaluations for Phase II Evaluations 13 of BK21 participation, number of publications during BK21 participation, and experience with international training. Labor market outcome indicators included choice between entering a PhD program and seeking a job,8 length of job search, and level of wages.